Edited by Benjamin_8, 12 December 2016 - 09:15 PM.


In general on alternate play-styles.
#1 Posted 12 December 2016 - 09:10 PM
#2 Posted 12 December 2016 - 09:25 PM
#3 Posted 12 December 2016 - 09:55 PM
#4 Posted 13 December 2016 - 02:57 AM
#5 Posted 13 December 2016 - 07:37 AM
#6 Posted 13 December 2016 - 01:21 PM
#7 Posted 13 December 2016 - 02:37 PM
Lizardguard, on 13 December 2016 - 08:21 AM, said:
Rome is a classic.
Well technically they all are. More people know about Rome than anything else in the game. Maybe Leonidas beats that because of 300, but in grade school we only really learned about Rome.
#8 Posted 13 December 2016 - 03:13 PM
Lizardguard, on 13 December 2016 - 08:21 AM, said:
Well I just can't get past the whole "rock thrower" stigma. Just seems so primitive.. so for that silly reason, I never got into slingers.
#9 Posted 13 December 2016 - 03:17 PM
#11 Posted 13 December 2016 - 08:10 PM
#12 Posted 13 December 2016 - 09:40 PM
#13 Posted 13 December 2016 - 09:59 PM
#14 Posted 14 December 2016 - 12:13 AM
@ApolloBez Slingers were no joke http://warfarehistor...pons-the-sling/ Most good ancient commanders were able to use them to great effect in support of their javelin, and archers due to their increased range, and if a lead stones tended to crack skulls. Also importantly you could quickly and more easily train someone to use a sling rather than wait for someone to be able to have the arm strength to pull back a bow.
A good example of their effectiveness is how Paullus(One of the Roman consuls) was fatally wounded by a baeleric slinger at Canae from a single shot to the head.
49.6. A military tribune called Gnaeus Lentulus was riding past, when he saw the bloodstained consul sitting on a rock. 49.7. “Lucius Aemilius Paullus,” he cried, “you are the only one whom the gods in heaven will hold blameless for today’s disaster. 49.8. Come, take my horse, while there is strength left in your body and I am here to act as your companion, supporter, and defender. Do not desecrate this dreadful battle further with a consul’s death. We have cause enough for tears of grief without that.” 49.9. The consul replied, “You are a brave man, Gnaeus Cornelius, and a good one. Bless you for it. But you have very little time to escape the enemy’s clutches; don’t waste it in futile acts of pity. Hurry!
- Livy Book 22

#15 Posted 14 December 2016 - 12:22 AM

#16 Posted 14 December 2016 - 01:04 PM
Block Quote
I watched an "Ancient Weapons" episode on The History Channel, some time ago, and was left with the impression that a using sling with any real precision , was a far harder skill to master than simply shooting a bow. They were doing a re-enactment of "David vs. Goliath" using some "slinger champion", (guess they have competitions somewhere overseas), and I think it was about a distance of 40 feet or so; and his accuracy was around 50%.
CrocodileTearsbro, on 13 December 2016 - 07:22 PM, said:
Yeah, I feel the same about the Myrmidons, only T2... heartbreaking.
Edited by ApolloBez, 14 December 2016 - 01:23 PM.
#17 Posted 15 December 2016 - 02:46 AM
#18 Posted 15 December 2016 - 06:44 PM
So,
Coming from an altogether different viewpoint, i love slingers because of a book called the earths children wich is a fictional tale set in a stone age setting. the main protagonist there uses a sling with extreme efectiveness.
Usually when i think about slings i think about those y shaped slingshots with some gum between that you pull back and let go. I was kinda amazed when i found out they actually used a sling differently and with a lot more success back then (note, this was before i played arena and read the book, and i was kinda young).
Now in a realistic view, i would imagine its a lot easier to learn to fire a shot somewhere than to fire an arrow somewhere. just like with Y shaped slings and the real hurtfull slings, bows are not the same. back then, it wasn´t easy to pull back a long bow without effort and for hours. You actually had to have specific muscles and even if you were muscular, the muscles you had to have were kinda specifit. I guess. So yea, in a batttle where it doesn´t matter where you shoot as long as you hit the general direction and shoot your stone several 100 meters, you´re bound to hit and hurt someone.
Edited by Lizardguard, 15 December 2016 - 06:45 PM.
#19 Posted 15 December 2016 - 07:02 PM
Well in pure speculation, I'd think that bullets thrown from a sling would lose their energy faster over distance than an arrow. Not to mention when opposed by some armors, they'd have to hit exposed flesh to be truly devastating. I saw another show where they tested arrows against armor, and even the best plate armors of the middle ages wouldn't completely stop arrow penetration.
***But***, there was a "Chinese Paper Armor", made up of many layers of paper sheets in small squares, glued together by some resin, that would; strange as it sounds.
In reference to your "realistic view", you're still talking about strength vs. timing and dexterity. Strength can always be achieved, not sow much with the other. And I'd assume, most boys would be taught to use bows from and early age; but then again, I'm sure slings were easier to make, cheaper to use... Yeah, ok scratch that.. lol
#20 Posted 15 December 2016 - 07:46 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users